Medical Decision Making and MDM Policy & Practice Reviewers, 2017.
نویسندگان
چکیده
The editor-in-chief, deputy editor, associate editors, editorial board, and staff of Medical Decision Making and MDM Policy & Practice, the official journals of the Society for Medical Decision Making, acknowledge and thank the following people for their assistance in reviewing manuscripts during 2016. The journals’ success rests in large measure on the quality and promptness of the reviews it receives from these volunteer reviewers. The thorough and detailed expert evaluation of scientific manuscripts submitted to MDM and MDM P&P is an essential contribution to the success and influence of the MDM journals—and we are grateful to all who contribute their time and knowledge. Reviewer names and, when available, earned academic degrees and certifications were taken from MDM’s ScholarOne Manuscripts Web site as of February 27, 2017. Reviewers who wish to update their profile information may do so by logging in to their reviewer accounts at: http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/mdm. To learn more about reviewing manuscripts for the MDM journals, please see: http://mdm.uic.edu/peer-review-process.
منابع مشابه
Mitigating Evidentiary Bias in Planning and Policy-Making; Comment on “Reflective Practice: How the World Bank Explored Its Own Biases?”
The field of cognitive psychology has increasingly provided scientific insights to explore how humans are subject to unconscious sources of evidentiary bias, leading to errors that can affect judgement and decision-making. Increasingly these insights are being applied outside the realm of individual decision-making to the collective arena of policy-making as well. A recent editorial in this jou...
متن کاملAssessing Patient Participation in Health Policy Decision-Making in Cyprus
Although the importance of patient participation in the design and evaluation of health programs and services is well-documented, there is scarcity of research with regard to patient association (PA) participation in health policy decision-making processes. To this end, the present study aimed to validate further a previously developed instrument as well as to investigate the degree of PA parti...
متن کاملMarkov decision processes: a tool for sequential decision making under uncertainty.
We provide a tutorial on the construction and evaluation of Markov decision processes (MDPs), which are powerful analytical tools used for sequential decision making under uncertainty that have been widely used in many industrial and manufacturing applications but are underutilized in medical decision making (MDM). We demonstrate the use of an MDP to solve a sequential clinical treatment proble...
متن کاملCosts of treatment after renal transplantation: is it worth to pay more?
Objectives: The present study aimed to provide an estimation of the current financial burden of renal transplantation therapy for insurance organisations.Methods: An Excel-based model was developed to determine the treatment costs of current clinical practice in renal transplantation therapy (RTT). Inputs were derived from Ministry of Health and insurance organizations` database, hospital and p...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making
دوره 38 3 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2017